home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: mk@anuurn.do.open.de (Martin Koehling)
- Subject: Re: mint-aware HD driver
- Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1993 21:50:38 MEZ
- Mime-Version: 1.0
-
- Claus Brod <clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com> writes:
-
- >> I was thinking about the problems with interrupt driven HD drivers,
- >> that cause mint not to block while doing disk access.
- >> One problem is that we would need a kind of semaphore for the dma hardware
- >> as it has to be locked against duplicate accesses at the same time.
- >
- >This is not a problem at all if we have a general /dev/scsi driver.
- >In this case, any process that wants to access SCSI hardware
- >directly would Fopen() that driver, and MiNT could apply its
- >usual restrictions against multiple access. We don't need semaphores
- >if there is only *one* official SCSI driver. Such a driver should,
- >however, probably have a Fcntl() mode to query its status, i.e. if
- >the SCSI channel is currently used by it.
- >
- >> What do you think about it?
- >
- >I think this is one of the less important problems. It's much more
- >important to have a reentrant GEMDOS, or else the whole project
- >comes to a grinding halt. That's exactly the point where my own driver
- >currently is. I haven't found the time yet to implement such a thing
- >in the MiNT kernel myself.
-
- I don't think it's strictly necessary to re-implement GEMDOS right now -
- simply putting something like
-
- Psemaphore(2,'GEMD',-1L) ; /* request GEMDOS Semaphore */
-
- /before/ and something like
-
- Psemaphore(3,'GEMD',-1L) ; /* release GEMDOS Semaphore */
-
- /after/ any GEMDOS calls in tosfs.c should protect GEMDOS from any
- reentrant calls.
-
- Or are there some hidden problems I'm overlooking?
- --
- Martin Koehling | mk@anuurn.do.open.de | Martin_Koehling@un.maus.ruhr.de
-